Dunham implied that a successful practice does not make it a valid argument for the practice of homeopathy. Today, homeopathy polypharmacy is common and practised quite successfully throughout the world. Therapeutics manuals suggest numerous standard prescriptions such as Lachesis for Pneumonia in Typhoid or Sepia for freckles on the cheeks. Everyone is familiar with the good old Arnica for bruises, or Chamomilla for the angry teething nipper. While he agreed that succession of remedies, where one remedy followed another, was fine, provided that each time the case was studied for a new prescription alternating remedies was objectionable to him.Īnd yet homeopathy, since Hahnemannian times, has had standard protocols for everything from simple injury to severe pathology. In the 1860s, Carroll Dunham discussed the merits of polypharmacy. Such responses are familiar among hard-core classicists. When someone asked Classical homeopath Jonathan Shore what he thought about giving a local pathological remedy together with the constitutional, he said “I feel that it is like putting a noose around my neck and jumping out of the window.” A carefully studied case should yield just the one remedy that fits the patient, not the disease. No two individuals with an identical disease are generally prescribed the same remedy. The founding precept of Classical Homeopathy is the treatment of patients based on the ‘totality of symptoms’ and their experience of a disease.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |